Books Read
Ready Player One by Ernest Cline
The Cardturner by Louis Sachar
Words Made Fresh by Larry Woiwode
I recommend all three of these books, but for different reasons. Anyone who spent any part of their childhood in the 1980s will probably enjoy Ready Player One, an action-adventure story set in a world where video games are more popular than real life. The Cardturner is written by the guy who wrote the book Holes and is a engaging drama that makes the game of bridge fun. Lastly, Words Made Fresh is a collection of essays with some powerful messages; it's written in the way that I wish I could write.
Movies Watched
The Smurfs
The Spine Tingler
Brother's Justice
Drive
The Spine Tingler is a great William Castle picture. Everyone should watch more William Castle movies. Brother's Justice was a fun mockementary. And Drive, one of the best movies of 2011, hands down.
A blog of the great "TV", an international man of mystery and distinguished gentleman. Adventures in education, useless trivia, spiritual observations, the life of a struggling actor, and rants on movies and books are just a minute sampling of the day-to-day experiences in the life of TV. Come, read about it, and enjoy the ride.
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Saturday, March 17, 2012
Book Review, Graphic Novel: THE ODYSSEY
A few years ago when I had to teach my first high school
freshmen English classes, part of our curriculum included excerpts from THE
ODYSSEY. While the textbook version sufficed for the students, I wanted to read
a translation of the entire book and not just excerpts. After doing some
research, I chose the Penguin version translated by Robert Fagles. The main
reason I chose the Fagles’ translation was because I wanted a version that I
could read quickly so that I could stay just ahead of my students and their
assigned readings from the textbook. Under different circumstances, I might
have chosen a more literal translation: as a student of the English language, I
don’t mind books that take longer to read and comprehend. However, given the
circumstances at the time, Fagles seemed the best choice.
However, despite Fagles’ choice of readability over poetry
and literal meaning, I enjoyed his translation of THE ODYSSEY. When I read it,
I was able to keep pace ahead of the excerpts my students were reading from
their textbook. Had my students been upper class students or college students,
this would be a translation that most of them would have been able to
understand best. This really is a translation for a modern audience.
Fagles’ translation also includes an introduction by Bernard
Knox that provides a context of the story and examines some of the major themes
of the story.
As for the story itself, Homer’s THE ODYSSEY is one of the
most famous stories in Western literature. It follows Odysseus after the Trojan
War and his long quest back home. Plagued by Poseidon and the gods who had
supported the Trojans and beleaguered by his beloved, but often inept crew,
Odysseus’ journey home to Ithaca takes another decade. Meanwhile, his faithful
wife Penelope fends off an army of suitors for her hand and young prince
Telemachus is sent on a mission by Athena to uncover new about his father.
There’s also Cyclops, sea monsters, drug-inducing flowers, beautiful witches,
and lots of fighting. THE ODYSSEY has been and will remain a story for the ages.
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Book Review, Graphic Novel: AMERICAN VAMPIRE VOLUME 2
AMERICAN VAMPIRE VOLUME 2 begins eleven years after AMERICAN
VAMPIRE VOLUME 1 ended. Like the previous edition, it’s split into two
different stories. The first, “Devil in the Sand” takes place in 1936 Las
Vegas. It introduces a new character to the saga, Cash McCogan, an officer for
the Las Vegas police department. There’s a series of grisly murders happening
in Las Vegas and Cash is convinced that Jim Smoke (aka Skinner Sweet) is
somehow behind the crimes. The murders bring two agents from the Vassals of the
Morning Star, a group of international vampire hunters, to Las Vegas who join
McCogan in his investigation. However, things aren’t exactly what they appear
to be and Cash finds himself in the midst of an alliance he could never have
imagined.
The second story in the volume, “Way Out,” features Pearl
and Henry. The two are now living as husband and wife. Like Sweet, Pearl is
determined to find and eliminate the old vampires who have infiltrated the U.S.
She and Henry have been living a fairly quiet life. However, there is a person
from Pearl’s life who hates Pearl as much as Pearl hates the old vampires and
this person is determined to make Pearl pay.
Even though Stephen King wrote part of AMERICAN VAMPIRE
VOLUME 1, I found AMERICAN VAMPIRE VOLUME 2 to be a better overall story. The book
can be read without having read the first volume. However, familiarity with the
first volume makes volume two much more interesting.
There is a difference in the artwork between “Devil in the
Sand” and “Way Out.” The styles of both volumes fit the stories they tell. For
instance, “Devil in the Sand” has a much darker and sinister tone than “Way
Out.” This fits because “Way Out” is mostly a story about Pearl and Henry and
their relationship together. The lines are softer and the shapes not as harsh
as are the illustrations in “Devil in the Sand.”
Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed AMERICAN VAMPIRE VOLUME 2.
Recommended for those who have read the first volume as well as anyone who is a
fan of Scott Snyder, those who enjoy interesting vampire stories, and those who
like horror comics.
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
Andrew Stanton Vs. Disney
I recently saw Disney's new live action picture, John Carter. I realize that we are not quite a fourth of the way through 2012, but so far, JOHN CARTER is the best movie of 2012. The script (adapted by Michael Cabon no less) is transcribed from Edgar Rice Burroughs' nearly century old story into 21st century vernacular. There's great action sequences and most of the special effects are seamless (there's only one scene that isn't). The movie has the potential to introduce a whole new audience to Burroughs' John Carter novels.
However, the movie had one of the worst marketing campaigns I've ever seen. The movie made $30 million in it's opening weekend, which was better than Hollywood number watchers were expecting, but far below the $250 million+ budget. The film did better on Saturday and Sunday than Friday, which suggests the film had some good word of mouth.
Disney seems to be throwing Stanton under the bus. "Reports are now surfacing" that Stanton was the one responsible for the poor advertising/marketing campaign. Really? I know Andrew Stanton wrote a huge amount of blockbuster animated films and directed several of those, too. But, this is a Disney picture. Disney is a king of marketing and cross-promoting. The trouble with the JOHN CARTER campaign started because Disney execs got scared when last year's MARS NEEDS MOMS bombed so bad. That movie bombed so bad that they forced Andrew Stanton to rename the movie from JOHN CARTER OF MARS to JOHN CARTER. That in itself was a very foolish marketing and advertising mistake. John Carter found fame on Mars, not Earth. The execs should have embraced that, but were too scared because of MARS NEEDS MOMS. There's so many ways that they could have marketed the film so it would get some buzz, but they didn't. Now they are blaming Stanton. Personally, Stanton probably was so involved in the actual making of the movie, that after they pulled the "OF MARS" from the title, he was so ticked off it probably made things worse.
With that said, you should go see JOHN CARTER. It's got something for everybody (men, women, kids, and old people). The story is well told. There are some really great effects that for the most part are seamless (there's only one scene in the whole movie that looks fake). It's the best movie of 2012 so far.
However, the movie had one of the worst marketing campaigns I've ever seen. The movie made $30 million in it's opening weekend, which was better than Hollywood number watchers were expecting, but far below the $250 million+ budget. The film did better on Saturday and Sunday than Friday, which suggests the film had some good word of mouth.
Disney seems to be throwing Stanton under the bus. "Reports are now surfacing" that Stanton was the one responsible for the poor advertising/marketing campaign. Really? I know Andrew Stanton wrote a huge amount of blockbuster animated films and directed several of those, too. But, this is a Disney picture. Disney is a king of marketing and cross-promoting. The trouble with the JOHN CARTER campaign started because Disney execs got scared when last year's MARS NEEDS MOMS bombed so bad. That movie bombed so bad that they forced Andrew Stanton to rename the movie from JOHN CARTER OF MARS to JOHN CARTER. That in itself was a very foolish marketing and advertising mistake. John Carter found fame on Mars, not Earth. The execs should have embraced that, but were too scared because of MARS NEEDS MOMS. There's so many ways that they could have marketed the film so it would get some buzz, but they didn't. Now they are blaming Stanton. Personally, Stanton probably was so involved in the actual making of the movie, that after they pulled the "OF MARS" from the title, he was so ticked off it probably made things worse.
With that said, you should go see JOHN CARTER. It's got something for everybody (men, women, kids, and old people). The story is well told. There are some really great effects that for the most part are seamless (there's only one scene in the whole movie that looks fake). It's the best movie of 2012 so far.
Wednesday, March 07, 2012
Book Review: JURASSIC PARK: REDEMPTION
I enjoyed the novel JURASSIC PARK and
loved the movie. When the film was first released in 1993, the film far
exceeded expectations and it was one of those rare instances where the movie
was better than the book it was based upon. Therefore, when I learned that IDW
had won the rights to publish a series of new comics for the series, I was
excited.
JURASSIC PARK: REDEMPTION is set
13 years after the events of Jurassic Park. Both Lex and Tim are grown up and
are successful entrepreneurs in their own right. Lex is a business celebrity
and one of her many projects has been developing a renewable food crop that
will solve the world’s hunger problem. Tim, meanwhile, has been secretly breeding
dinosaurs in an underground facility in Texas. He wants to build a new Jurassic
Park that consists of only herbivore dinosaurs. However, unbeknownst to Tim,
one of the employees at the facility is actually a spy hired by Tim’s largest
secret backer and has been raising some carnivorous creatures, too. The time
comes to begin moving the creatures to their new home, but then one of the
creatures escapes (or is released?) and begins causing destruction all around
the area.
I was excited that Lex and Tim were
back, but JURASSIC PARK: REDEMPTION is a huge disappointment. The story jumps
around all over the place and it’s incredibly difficult to follow what exactly
is going on. There are times when a person is attacked by a dinosaur and left
for dead and then the story immediately switches in the next panel to a
completely different scene. Later it’s revealed that the person who died
earlier, didn’t really die, but just had a flesh wound. Then there are other
times when a person is killed, but the next panel cuts away to a completely
different scene then it’s later revealed the person really was killed. There
are characters who appear in this story that died in both the books and movies
of Jurassic Park. Then there’s the artwork. It’s not really good. There’s no real
distinction between the different dinosaurs other than in size. There are
sections where you see a dinosaur and you think it’s a carnivore when it’s
actually an herbivore and vice versa. I was also really distracted by the noses
of the people. I’m not sure what it is, but the noses of the human characters
just don’t fit well with the rest of their faces. The noses look like they’ve
been penciled in.
Overall, JURASSIC PARK: REDEMPTION
has a promising premise, but it’s ruined by poor execution, jumpy storytelling,
and lackluster illustrations.
Tuesday, March 06, 2012
Book Review: ZIG AND WIKKI IN THE COW
Book Review: EXCALIBUR: THE LEGEND OF KING ARTHUR
In this graphic novel version of the legend of King Arthur from Tony Lee
& Sam Hart, Arthur isn’t just a regular mortal man, but instead is part
fairy and is chosen by the good fairies to be King of Albion (England).
However, his half-sister, Morgana, is taken by the evil fairies and raised in
the black arts. She comes to despise Arthur and all that he stands for. Unlike many
of the stories we read about Arthur, in this version he is fully aware of his
familial lineage. However, he begins to doubt the existence of the wizard
Merlin until Merlin appears just before Arthur sets off to face the evil King
Ulrich. Merlin sends Arthur away to the good fairy realm of Albion where a year
is as a few hours in Albion. While there, Arthur falls in love with Vivianne,
the Lady of the Lake. He ends up staying in Avalon for two years before
returning to face Ulrich in Albion, where only a day has passed. Thus begins
Arthur’s journey to becoming King.I had been looking forward to reading EXCALIBUR: THE LEGEND OF KING ARTHUR. I enjoy the legends of King Arthur and was excited to see how this updated version would be. I was disappointed. I don’t mind trying to update the stories of Arthur. However, EXCALIBUR does more than just update the stories. It changes the very essence of Arthur. Instead of the man who would be king, he becomes the fairy man that’s destined to be king. The mystery (and humor) of some of the tales are explained away through faire knowledge (aka magic). Arthur’s love for Guinevere and the betrayal of Lancelot and Guinevere are easily forgiven because in this version of the story, Guinevere was not really Arthur’s true love. That’s just one example of how the Arthur legends are distorted.
I was also disappointed by the artwork. I had seen Sam Hart’s work in an earlier graphic novel, OUTLAW: THE LEGEND OF ROBIN HOOD. In that book, the illustrations were much too dark. The illustrations in EXCALIBUR are better than in OUTLAW and there isn’t as much shadowing and dark colors as there was in that book. However, the expressions and physical positions of the characters in EXCALIBUR are bland, dull, and often emotionless. EXCALIBUR is supposed to be an exciting updating of the Arthur legends, but it’s difficult to become excited about a story when one of the most exciting panels is seeing a withered Arthur after part of his “life force” has been taken from him by an evil fairy. There is so much more of the story, but the illustration don’t do the story justice.
Overall, EXCALIBUR is a disappointing update of the King Arthur legends. The story suffers from giving the tale a fairy subplot and the actual graphic novel itself suffers from mediocre illustrations.
Sunday, March 04, 2012
A Cereal Killer
This is a strip from "The Argyle Sweater" by Scott Hilburn. I'm not sure when it ran, but I came across it in the book Puns of Steel. I don't know why, but I find it hilarious.
Thursday, March 01, 2012
Short Book Review: DANTE'S INFERNO: THE GRAPHIC NOVEL
Dante’s THE INFERNO is one of those pieces of literature that has had a
massive impact upon Western culture and its impact can be seen and felt even
today. However, it’s also a work that intimidates many people. Using Gustave
Dore’s famous black and white illustrations of THE DIVINE COMEDY and some of
the dialogue taken from the text, Joseph Lanzara has molded together a work
that is both breathtaking and highly accessible to a modern audience. Lanzara
has streamlined the narrative, but readers who are new to Dante or THE DIVINE
COMEDY will come away with some of the key points of the story as well as an
appreciation of the vivid imagery contained within Dante’s famed story after
reading this graphic novel. DANTE’S INFERNO: THE GRAPHIC NOVEL makes an
excellent introduction to THE DIVINE COMEDY, but it is also a work that students
and fans of the text will probably enjoy and appreciate.
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Pearls Before Swine Occupies Sesame Street
Back in January of this year, one of my favorite comic strips, "Pearls Before Swine" took on the Occupy Movement and illustrated how ridiculous much of it is when one of the characters in the strip (Rat) Occupied Sesame Street. Here are the three main strips from that storyline. I think they're hilarious. Maybe Stephan Pastis will finally win the Reuben Award this year.
-Monday, January 9, 2012, "Pearls Before Swine"
-Tuesday, January 10, 2012, "Pearls Before Swine"
-Wednesday, January 11, 2012, "Pearls Before Swine"
Labels:
comics,
humor,
news,
Pearls Before Swine,
politics,
Sesame Street,
Stephan Pastis
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










